AFFECTIVE POLARIZATION AND THE DESTABILIZATION OF CORE POLITICAL VALUES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/p58vg094Keywords:
Affective polarization, Core political values, Democratic norms, Partisan identity, Political polarization, Civic valuesAbstract
Affective polarization – intense partisan animosity – has become a defining feature of many contemporary democracies. This article examines how such polarization interacts with citizens’ core political values (e.g. support for democracy, equality, rule of law) and whether rising polarization undermines those values. Through a systematic review of recent literature, we trace theoretical accounts and empirical findings on both sides of this relationship. We analyze U.S. panel and survey studies alongside comparative research to identify themes such as values driving polarization, polarization reshaping values, and effects on democratic norms. Our methodology involved searches in major databases (e.g. Scopus, Web of Science) for peer-reviewed studies on “affective polarization” and “political values,” and we coded the findings thematically. Key results indicate a complex interplay: in earlier U.S. data (1990s), entrenched values contributed to partisan animus, but recent evidence (2016–2020) suggests the reverse – intense interparty dislike now increases value extremism. Elsewhere, comparative studies find that although polarization generally correlates with distrust of institutions, mass publics often still endorse basic democratic norms. We discuss how, overall, affective polarization can erode shared commitment to democratic principles under extreme conditions, even if broad value support appears resilient for now. The paper concludes by highlighting implications for institutional trust and suggesting directions for future research.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2020). How affective polarization shapes Americans’ political beliefs: A study of response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2020.28
Enders, A. M., & Lupton, R. N. (2021). Value extremity contributes to affective polarization in the US. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(4), 857–866.
Holliday, D. E., Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., & Westwood, S. J. (2024). Uncommon and nonpartisan: Antidemocratic attitudes in the American public. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(13), e2307211121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2307211121
Janssen, L., & Turkenburg, E. (2023). Breaking free from linear assumptions: Unraveling the relationship between affective polarization and democratic support. Unpublished manuscript.
Masood, A. S., Strickler, R., & Zilis, M. A. (2024). The rule of law in red and blue: Affective polarization and support for legal institutions in the United States. American Politics Research, 52(4), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X241253262
Ollerenshaw, T. (2023). Affective polarization and the destabilization of core political values. Political Science Research and Methods, 13(1), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2023.34
Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31(3), 421–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00764.x
Wagner, M. (2024). Affective polarization in Europe. European Political Science Review, 16(3), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773923000383
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.
Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity and Divided Our Nation. University of Chicago Press.
Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 416–440.
Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, C. (2020). (Chapter reference). In L. Garritzmann & N. Reeskens (Eds.), Western European Parties and Immigration (pp. 311–333). Oxford University Press. (On polarization and values.)
Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press. (On democratic values.)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rivus Scientiarum Applicatarum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License Terms (for journal policy or each article)
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows:
-
Sharing — You may copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
-
Adaptation — You may remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
There are no additional restrictions — you may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.